Editor,
The news “India withdraws transshipment facility for B’desh days after Yunus’ remarks” (ST April 10, 2025) is interesting. The termination of the transhipment facility between India and Bangladesh carries significant implications for trade and regional dynamics. Without access to India’s transit routes, Bangladesh exports to third countries such as Nepal, Bhutan and Myanmar will face logistical challenges. Increased transportation costs and delays are likely, potentially impacting the competitiveness of Bangladesh goods in these markets. Landlocked nations like Nepal and Bhutan depend on India’s infrastructure for trade with Bangladesh. The termination may disrupt their supply chains and raise concerns about transit accessibility. They might seek alternative arrangements or raise the issue under international trade agreements. The decision could strain India-Bangladesh relations, as the facility was a vital component of trade collaboration.
This action highlights the geopolitical tensions, particularly regarding Chinese investments in Bangladesh near India’s strategic Siliguri Corridor (Chicken’s Neck). Legally the move might be seen as inconsistent with the World Trade Organization’s (WTO) rules on transit freedom, which advocate for fair access for landlocked nations to global markets through neighbouring countries. The economic repercussions of this action could push Bangladesh to further strengthen ties with China for alternative trade solutions, impacting regional economic dynamics. The termination of the trans-shipment facility introduces uncertainties in trade logistics and geopolitics in South Asia. It reflects broader strategic decisions amid evolving regional alliances.
The termination also has significant implications for local businesses in Bangladesh. Businesses will face higher transportation costs as they lose access to India’s streamlined transit routes. This could make Bangladesh goods less competitive in international markets. Exporters will counter delays and uncertainties in shipping goods to third countries like Nepal, Bhutan and Myanmar. This disruption could affect supply chains and delivery timelines. The facility previously provided a cost-effective way for Bangladeshi businesses to reach neighbouring markets. Its removal may limit their ability to expand or maintain trade relationships. Businesses might need to explore alternative routes or partnerships, potentially increasing reliance on other countries, such as China, for trade facilitation. Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs), which often operate on tighter margins, are likely to be hit hardest by increased costs and logistical hurdles, potentially threatening their sustainability. This decision could reshape the trade landscape for Bangladeshi businesses, pushing them to adapt to new challenges and explore alternative strategies.
The termination of the transshipment facility could have notable implications for India’s relationship with China. Bangladesh’s move to strengthen ties with China, particularly near India’s strategic Siliguri Corridor, raises concerns for India. This corridor is vital for connecting Northeast India with the rest of the country, and increased Chinese involvement in the region could heighten geopolitical tensions. China’s growing influence in Bangladesh, including investments in infrastructure and trade, may lead to increased competition between India and China for regional dominance. India might respond by enhancing its own strategic partnerships and investments in neighbouring countries. The shift in trade routes and alliances could impact regional economic dynamics. India may need to reassess its trade policies and infrastructure development to counterbalance China’s expanding role. India’s decision to terminate the facility might be perceived as a response to Bangladesh’s alignment with China. This could influence diplomatic relations between India and China, as both nations navigate their interests in South Asia. This development underscores the complex interplay of trade, diplomacy and strategic interests in the region.
Yours etc;
VK Lyngdoh
Via email
Constructive article on Meghalaya’s road-making projects
Editor,
Bijoy A Sangma’s editorial, “Why Meghalaya’s Roads Never Seem to Reach Their Destination?” (ST April 10, 2025), is a compelling and well-researched piece that goes beyond mere criticism to present a holistic view of the road infrastructure challenges in Meghalaya. With a thoughtful blend of statistical backing, grounded local realities, and policy insight, Sangma effectively shines a light on the systemic issues hampering timely road completion in the state.
What stands out is his balanced tone—he acknowledges the efforts of the government, such as the massive budgetary commitments and visionary projects like the Meghalaya Integrated Transport Project (MITP), while unflinchingly dissecting the real hurdles: administrative inefficiencies, land acquisition challenges, contractor issues, corruption, and weather constraints. The article does not stop at diagnosing problems; it also suggests practical remedies, including better contractor accountability, community involvement, public-private partnerships, and the need for efficient project execution.
Sangma’s critique is constructive, grounded in data, and written with a genuine concern for the citizens of Meghalaya. His call for political will, public engagement, and professional oversight comes at a critical time when the state is striving for development and better connectivity. The article is both a wake-up call and a roadmap for reform.
In short, this article is an important contribution to the public discourse on infrastructure development in the Northeast. It not only informs but also inspires actionable change—a must-read for policymakers, citizens, and all who care about Meghalaya’s future.
Yours etc.,
Katchan Salakim R. Marak,
Via email
Learning, not leveraging
Editor,
I am writing to chime into yesterday’s unbiased article “A Step Towards Educational Equity in Meghalaya,” which thoughtfully examines the CM IMPACT initiative.
It is unfortunate that a well-meaning initiative like the CM IMPACT guidebook—designed to support students—has become a target of political rivalry, with some parties using children’s education as a pawn in their agenda-driven narratives. When even the principal of St. Margaret’s School publicly praised the CM IMPACT guidebook for its usefulness, the backlash in the form of derogatory social media comments was not only disheartening but revealed how constructive educational efforts are being drowned in politically motivated noise. It is like questioning & undermining the capacities of the students.
As highlighted, Meghalaya’s education system faces significant challenges, particularly in rural areas where resources are scarce. The CM IMPACT guidebooks serve as essential tools, bridging gaps for students lacking access to quality coaching or subject-specific teachers. By complementing existing MBoSE-approved textbooks, these guides enhance understanding and provide structured practice aligned with the SSLC exam format. As mentioned in the article, if this guidebook was not named CM impact, there would be praises galore for it. Last week I came across MPSC job openings and the examination centres have been extended to Jowai, Williamnagar and Nongstoin besides the existing centres at Shillong and Tura. This is another example of bringing opportunity to door steps just as CM Impact presents.
Critics have raised concerns about potential over-reliance on such materials. However, it is crucial to recognize that in under-resourced settings, structured guidebooks can level the playing field, offering all students, regardless of their geographic location, a fair opportunity to succeed. Moreover, these resources assist teachers in lesson planning and focus, thereby enhancing overall instructional quality. While improvements are undoubtedly necessary moving forward, this should not entail a complete dismissal of the existing guidebook. Rather, a thorough review in consultation with relevant stakeholders should be undertaken to identify areas for enhancement and ensure its continued relevance and effectiveness
To further strengthen this initiative, incorporating visual aids like concept maps and flowcharts could cater to diverse learning styles, especially benefiting visual learners. Additionally, developing digital versions of the guidebooks would extend their reach, accommodating students in areas with internet access.
Education should remain above political discourse. The primary focus must be on the students’ welfare and their right to quality education. Initiatives like CM IMPACT represent significant strides toward educational equity in Meghalaya.
Yours etc.,
Bahunlang Pde,
Via email